Control Experiments for Driver Line Expression

on Monday, February 9th, 2026 12:44 | by

SS45779 – Targeting b3 MN, iii3 MN, hg1 MN

Our line:

Janelia image:

IS69306 – b1 mn driver line

Janelia image:

Retro-Tango control crossed with GF-Gal4 (BDSC: 79602), presynaptic neurons in magenta, giant fiber neurons in cyan and background staining in gray

Retro-Tango x GF-Gal4 from Sorkac et. al (2023)

rut and rad expression in b1 and b3 motor neurons, I looked for cells express 6 genes (rut, rad, FoxP, VGlut, AD TF, DBD TF) at the same time above certain threshold:

Driver LineAD TFDBD TFTargeted cellsCells express all 6 genes at more than 0Cells express all 6 genes at more than  1 foldCells express all 6 genes at more than 2 fol
SS40980CG12680Cep104 (CG10137)b1 MN, iii1 MN, iii3 MN000
SS45779Ubxabb3 MN, iii3 MN, hg1 MN15800
SS47160Ubxhryb2 MN, b3 MN, iii4 MN, hg1 MN, hg3 MN100
SS48311UbxNetBb3 MN, hg1 MN, XBI002, WBI00978442
SS49806???timb3 MN, hg1 MN, HBI017
SS52405UbxCG4168b3 MN, i2 MN, hg3 MN46251
IS69306CG14388 (CG31345)Awhb1 driver000
SS98650ctUbxb3 driver76390
IS38497beat-IIIbbab1b1&b334151

Torque measurements 2.2. – 6.2

on Monday, February 9th, 2026 12:41 | by

Results from 3.2. with the laser at the lowest intensity
Results from 5.2. with the laser at an increased intensity
Results from 6.2. with the laser at about 1/3 intensity
Combined results from last week
Breakdown of results

Confocal images Daniel’s samples

on Monday, February 9th, 2026 12:33 | by

Fly brains from Daniels split-gal4 line crossed with GFP. My stainings with chick-GFP on the left and Daniel’s on the right. The middle column is NC82 which doesn’t appear to have succeeded, but we’ve been having problems with that antibody.

Results of salt (1.5 M) avoidance tests for the first crossing under red light

on Monday, February 9th, 2026 10:40 | by

A: w1118 × dicer2; SNPFR-RNAi
B: w1118 × dicer2; H24-Gal4
C: dicer2; SNPFR-RNAi × dicer2; H24-Gal4

Larvae were placed in the center of an agar plate with plain agar on one side and salt-containing agar (1.5 M NaCl) on the other. After 3 minutes, larval distribution was quantified using a preference index under red light. All three groups showed significant salt avoidance, but no significant differences were observed between the groups.

First pilot experiments on different stressors

on Sunday, February 8th, 2026 9:42 | by

On Wednesday I tested the “heatshock” group, using light (with the same intensity as the aversive stimulus in the joystick experiment: ~800lux) for 5 minutes before testing, to stress the flies.

Stressor: heat (5min; 7.4V; ~800lux)

Gr28bd+TrpA1(Co): control group

Gr28bd+TrpA1: experimental group

 
On Friday I tested flies who were maintained in a cold environment (18°C) during the ATR treatment (2 days).

Stressor: cold (18°C; 48h)

Gr28bd+TrpA1(Co): Control group

Gr28bd+TrpA1: Experimental group

End Results for salt (1.5 M) avoidance test in the [ChR2-XXL/Cy0 Dop1R2-RNAi/Tm3] crossings under red and blue light

on Sunday, February 8th, 2026 4:08 | by

p values: A red light <-> B red light = 0.39366; A blue light <-> B blue light: 0.68727; A red light <-> A blue light: 0.00136; B red light <-> B blue light: 0.02590

Yaw-torque experiments

on Monday, February 2nd, 2026 12:40 | by

Flies 48 hours on RU486 wetted tissue

Flies 48 hours on RU486 wetted instant_food

Mean OMRs at start

Torque measurements 29.01.2026

on Monday, February 2nd, 2026 11:00 | by

First results of salt (1.5 M) avoidance tests in groups A, B, and C under red light

on Saturday, January 31st, 2026 9:00 | by

Drosophila larvae from three groups (A, B, and C) were placed in the center of an agar plate containing plain agar on one side and salt-containing agar (1.5 M) on the other. After 3 minutes, larval distribution was quantified using a preference index under red light. All three groups showed a significant avoidance of salt. No significant differences in salt avoidance were observed between the groups.

First set of joystick experiments

on Saturday, January 31st, 2026 7:28 | by

Last week I started to test CsChrimson (NorpA, 20xUAS-Chrimson) flies with the joystick set up, to reproduce Daniels’ data on the positive control and to get used to the experimental set up.

There is a noticeable improvement (from my end) from the first two days of testing to the last two days.

These are the results of the first four days of testing. All in all, the positive control shows good avoidance. Althoug, there is a remarkable change in the error bars starting with the fifth period. Maybe due to exhaustion or any other effect that I don’t know of yet.