General behavior of the MBON-2
on Monday, August 31st, 2020 12:54 | by Anders Eriksson
I wanted to expand and look into some general behavior of the mbon-2 flies. Mostly as a complement to the already existing data.
Category: genetics, Lab, Memory, Operant learning, operant self-learning, Optomotor response, science | No Comments
Progress Week 29
on Monday, July 20th, 2020 1:38 | by Anders Eriksson
-Introduced Sayani to the wonderful world of Drosophila
-Been doing some DTS coding
-Preparing flies to do optomotor response for Mathias Raß
Category: flight, genetics, Lab, Memory, Optomotor response, R code | No Comments
Progress for week 25:
on Monday, June 22nd, 2020 1:58 | by Anders Eriksson
DTS coding
-Added progressbar for data validation
-Updated the progress bar (see figure 1)
-Fixed bug with wrong sample size (see figure 2)
-Fixed bug with unorganized barplots (see figure 2)
Exp always to the right: plotOMparams <- plotOMparams[order(plotOMparams$desc),]
plotOMparams$group <- factor(plotOMparams$group, levels=paste(unique(plotOMparams$group)))
Samplesize fix:samplesizes.annotate(boxes, as.numeric(table(plotOMparams$desc)))
Progressbar: progress <- c(round(l(100/(length(xml_list)))),round(flycount(100/(totalflies))))
Rescreening:
-Finished rescreening last Thursday. Started to evaluate the new data
Optomotor platform: Ran a few more tests to confirm that the machine was still working, it is. I also adjusted the 0 line so that it is at 0, by readjusting the “zero line” screw. Looks much better now but it is still not perfectly at 0. A difference 0.1 on the computer screen translates to 100 in the evaluation chart.
Optomotor platform:
Ran a few more tests to confirm that the 0 line is always at 0. Readjusted the “zero line” screw. Looks much better now. It is still not perfectly at 0 but a difference of 0.1 in the chart translates to 100 in the evaluation graph.
Category: Lab, Optomotor response, R code, Uncategorized | No Comments
Statistical evaluation of OR
on Monday, May 25th, 2020 12:23 | by Anders Eriksson
Recently I measured the optomotor response in T4/T5 flies. As expected, they did not respond to the optomotor stimulus as seen in the left chart below. However, statistical evaluation struggles to quantify this difference. It might be that this is because of the low sample size, or that we are using the wrong statistical analysis?
Category: crosses, genetics, Lab, Optomotor response, R code | No Comments
Motion blindness in T4/T5 using Optomotor Response
on Tuesday, March 31st, 2020 1:48 | by Anders Eriksson
Category: genetics, Lab, Optomotor response | No Comments
Optomotor response works consistently with old platform
on Friday, March 20th, 2020 3:23 | by Anders Eriksson
The old platform works a lot more consistently compared to the new one. Unless major improvements are seen I do not see any reason to update it.
Category: Optomotor response | No Comments
Updates on optomotor response software
on Friday, March 20th, 2020 3:19 | by Anders Eriksson
- Added a timer
- Previous version generated faulty xml files. This bug has been squashed (see image below)
- Display window of the software now also prints which direction the striped arena turns
Category: Optomotor response, R code, Uncategorized | No Comments
New optomotor platform not yet optimized
on Monday, March 16th, 2020 1:42 | by Anders Eriksson
A new platform have been designed for the optomotor response. It is placed on a pivot with the axis attached on the back. In contrast to the previous design witch only monitored movement in the left/right direction, the new design in theory allows the fly to rotate the platform.
Category: Optomotor response | No Comments
Optomotor evaluation
on Wednesday, February 19th, 2020 1:51 | by Anders Eriksson
Category: Optomotor response | No Comments