Fussl shows numerical difference in operant self learning
on Tuesday, August 7th, 2018 2:49 | by Anders Eriksson
Fussl was crossed with either Stinger (ctrl) or a UAS-TNT line to block the synaptric transmission of the Fussl positive neurons. A third construct was used but did not yield any data due to difficulties with their flight performance. The Fussl-Stinger along with Fussl-TNT flies do also show difficulties in flying. These differences will be assessed.
The experiment was done as a pilot experiment before doing a larger scale.
The data is a bit inconsistent but shows a positive and reassuring numerical difference. The control is a bit lower than expected, compared to WTB flies (showing usually a PI 0f 0.6). The flies have a slightly different background than wtb flies and have pale orange eyes (still no apparent impairments in vision). Further experiments will be conducted before proceeding with a larger sample size of the flies.
Category: crosses, flight, genetics, Lab, Memory, operant self-learning | No Comments
Role of dopaminergic neurons in operant behaviour
on Friday, July 27th, 2018 3:54 | by Gaia Bianchini



Positive Control: Gr28bd-G4, TrpA1-G4
Parameters: Light: intensity (500 Lux side, 1000 Lux bottom); frequency = 20Hz; Delay = 1 ms; Duration = 9.9 ms; volts = 6.4
Red lines: completed
mb025b: not selected against tubby
T-Maze experiments : screen results as on 16-07-2018
on Monday, July 16th, 2018 1:32 | by Gaia Bianchini
Results of the T-maze screen analysis, both individual and combined.


Yellow 1 (Positive Control): Gr28bd-G4, TrpA1-G4
Parameters: Light: intensity (500 Lux side, 1000 Lux bottom); frequency = 20Hz; Delay = 1 ms; Duration = 9.9 ms; volts = 6.4
Crosses for isogenize FoxP-IsoB-Gal4 line
on Tuesday, June 19th, 2018 12:13 | by Ottavia Palazzo
Category: crosses, Foxp | No Comments
Initial screen results
on Monday, June 18th, 2018 1:15 | by Gaia Bianchini

Yellow 1 (Positive Control): Gr28bd-G4, TrpA1-G4
Light: intensity (500 Lux side, 1000 Lux bottom), frequency (20Hz)
Category: crosses, genetics, lab.brembs.net, neuronal activation, open science, Operant learning, Optogenetics | No Comments
CD8-GFP x FoxP-IsoB_Gal4
on Friday, June 8th, 2018 11:47 | by Ottavia Palazzo
Not confocal immages (going to the confocal this week)
The construct I am analyzing is the FoxP-IsoB_Gal4, so with the Gal4 inserted in the 8th exon
Larvae
Adult VNC
Category: crosses, Foxp | No Comments
quality test before strokelitude experiments
on Monday, January 29th, 2018 12:40 | by Christian Rohrsen
Some traces from this week just so that you have an idea how do they look like. To me they are not the optimal traces I expected. But one can see some signal there. I will start the screen hoping to get enough good traces without too much work.
what do you think is the best quality control for accepting a trace for the analysis or not. I was thinking the 3D mapping gives a good hint but without quantification.
In addition I was writting to Andi Straw to solve the issue of running two cameras in the same computers, but now answer

Category: crosses, flight, genetics, Spontaneous Behavior, strokelitude, WingStroke | No Comments
Usage of TrpA with infrared lamp
on Wednesday, February 13th, 2013 11:40 | by Christine Damrau
As a pilot for future experiments I tried to reproduce results from Keene et al., 2012. There, they substituted sugar by a laser to provoke PER after 24h of starvation (females, one week old). In TH-GAL4 they found 100% response when they pointed the laser to head or thorax. In tdc2-GAL4 indeed they found 50% of flies responding to heat but only when the laser was pointed to the thorax but not to the head.
Since we do not have this kind of laser, they used, I played around with an infrared light. Flies were fixed to hooks and a clamp as always. First, there was given a filter paper soaked with EVIAN-water (negative control), then there were 10s of heat (36-38°C), afterwards two positive controls: 30% sucrose on the legs and finally on the labellum.
In the figure, you can see that I am able to reproduce the methods with an infrared lamp instead of a laser. The TH-GAL4 flies crossed to TrpA respond much more to heat compared to the controls (see figure in blue and red). The proboscis extension appears already after a few seconds.
Unfortunately, I could not reproduce the results for tdc2-GAL4 (see figure in green). There was no response to heat found at all. (tdc2-GAL4 has to be ok, because I see fluorescence when crossed to GCaMP). Interestingly, the flies did not respond as strong to the 30% sucrose as expected. The starvation may have to be longer to increase motivation?
Next step will be to see a phenotype that can be seen by activating tdc2-GAL4. That may be PER after longer starvation or flight behavior.
Category: Biogenic Amines, crosses, genetics, neuronal activation, PER, TrpA | 1 Comment
Crosses to check the TARGET flies
on Tuesday, December 4th, 2012 12:49 | by Julien Colomb
Since we have problems with Madeleine’s project, I will make crosses to test that the flies are ok before using them for PKC RNAi experiments.
the putative elavGal$;tubGal80ts flies will be crossed to w; AKAP/Cyo flies. Then the son ElavGal4/Y, tubGal80ts/+ will be crossed to w.
Only non Cyo male flies should get white eyes, if not, the stock is not clean.
In parallel, I will also start crossing nsybGal4 into the tubGal80ts line (2 to 4 crosses necessary depending on the eye color of the heterozygotes).
Category: crosses, genetics | No Comments





