on Monday, March 27th, 2017 2:07 | by Weitian Sun
5 measurements on self learning from rover:
6 measurements on self learning form sitter:
10 measurements on self learning from wtb:
4 measrements on long term test from rover:
3 measrements on long term test from sitter (fly stops a lot during test, this result may not be accurate):
7 measrements on long term test from wtb
on | by Axel Gorostiza
I am currently testing different dopaminergic GAL4s in order to validate previous results from my initial screening. Here I can find the results for one of those GAL4s
on Monday, March 20th, 2017 2:17 | by Axel Gorostiza
I recently combined the two TbH-lexA lines (54954 & 54075) with CD8GFP, and the TDC2-GAL4 line with CD8RFP, in order to compare their expression patterns. Here I present some of the dissections. The confocal is not working properly, but it is relatively good to draw some conclusions.
TDC2>GFP and anti-TβH (Scholz’s Lab)
TDC2>GFP (Gerber’s Lab)
anti-TDC2 (Goodwin’s Lab)
on | by Weitian Sun
PKG rover self learning N=5
rover test on next day N=2
WTB self learning N=7
WTB test on next day N=4
2 rover, 4 wtb, 1 sitter test result after 24 hours
on Monday, March 13th, 2017 3:01 | by Axel Gorostiza
After refining my DA screening, I end up having three interesting GAL4s which lead to changes in photopreference after expressing Shibire and rising the temperature. What I am trying to do now is to understand if they label the same neuronal population or not.
on Friday, March 10th, 2017 2:30 | by Weitian Sun
on Monday, March 6th, 2017 10:17 | by Weitian Sun
There is the result of 20 measurements on PKG rover.
on Monday, February 27th, 2017 12:43 | by Christian Rohrsen
on Friday, February 24th, 2017 1:48 | by Weitian Sun
After adjusting the laser angle, PI got much improved. But, the test 2 phase shows a lower PI than test 1 in most of cases, the reason for that is still unclear. The following is the result of 9 measurements without drifting.
train1 PI: 0.50
test2: 0.06 ???