Updates on R,S,WTB tests
Rover, N=3
sitter, N=2
wtb, N=4
longterm, N=13 (old WTB excluded)
R,S self learning traces, and longterm memory trace
WTB self learning traces, longterm memory trace
newWTB vs oldWTB
The behavior of new and old WTB seems different, but since only a few flies are tested, the results are not conclusive.
newWTB =3, PI= 0.35
old WTB from last month = 7, PI=0.04
flying trace,
wtb72 (old, left punishment)
wtb 74,78 (new, right punishment)
summary of self learning test data, and standardize data
PKG-rover:
N = 24
pretest1 : -0.58
training1:0.53
training2:0.64
test1:0.22
training3:0.82
training4:0.84
test2:0.23
Standardization: ALL data +2?, then (test2-pretest)/pretest
standardized test2: 0.71
PKG-sitter:
N = 10
pretest1 : -0.24
training1:0.37
training2:0.58
test1:0.20
training3:0.75
training4:0.72
test2:0.41
standardized test2: 0.48
WTB:
N = 13
pretest1 : -0.46
training1:0.70
training2:0.73
test1:-0.01
training3:0.76
training4:0.81
test2:0.16
standardized test2: 0.57
update on self learning&longterm memory
longterm test:
1 from sitter, 8 from wtb, 3 from rover (total N = 12)
mean(test): 0.248 SD(test): 0.7
Longterm test Control
1 from sitter, 2 from rover (N=3)
mean(test):-0.386 SD(test):0.79
Two Sample:
Based on 50%(20%) of statistical power, the minimum sample size is 7 (17)for both group.
One Sample (assume control group has the average of PI is 0):
Based on 50% (20%) of statistical power, the minimum sample size is 22 (49)for both group.
https://www.dssresearch.com/KnowledgeCenter/toolkitcalculators/samplesizecalculators.aspx
Self learning test:
sitter N=5
wtb N= 4
update on self learning and longterm memory
5 measurements on self learning from rover:
6 measurements on self learning form sitter:
10 measurements on self learning from wtb:
4 measrements on long term test from rover:
(right punishment)
3 measrements on long term test from sitter (fly stops a lot during test, this result may not be accurate):
(13:left punishment, 19: right punishment)
7 measrements on long term test from wtb
(left punishment)
PKG and WTB self learning test and long term memory test
PKG rover self learning N=5
rover test on next day N=2
WTB self learning N=7
WTB test on next day N=4
2 rover, 4 wtb, 1 sitter test result after 24 hours
self learning from WTB
By contrast of PKG rover, this result shows PI from wtb. N = 4
test1 PI= -0.05
test2 PI= -0.08
PKG rover update
There is the result of 20 measurements on PKG rover.
pretest:-0.45
train1:0.56
train2:0.71
test1:0.47
train3:0.83
train4:0.87
test2:0.39
PKG rover update
After adjusting the laser angle, PI got much improved. But, the test 2 phase shows a lower PI than test 1 in most of cases, the reason for that is still unclear. The following is the result of 9 measurements without drifting.
train1 PI: 0.50
train2: 0.42
test1: 0.39
train3:0.61
train4: 0.63
test2: 0.06 ???
