View Profile

on Friday, May 26th, 2017 1:20

Rover, N=3

sitter, N=2

wtb, N=4

longterm, N=13 (old WTB excluded)

R,S self learning traces, and longterm memory trace

WTB self learning traces, longterm memory trace

## newWTB vs oldWTB

on Monday, May 22nd, 2017 10:37

The behavior of new and old WTB seems different, but since only a few flies are tested, the results are not conclusive.

newWTB =3, PI= 0.35

old WTB from last month = 7,  PI=0.04

flying trace,

wtb72 (old, left punishment)

wtb 74,78 (new, right punishment)

## update on rover&sitter test and longterm memory test

on Friday, May 12th, 2017 3:41

R=30

S=20

longterm memory N= 22

control N= 6

## summary of self learning test data, and standardize data

on Monday, April 10th, 2017 1:19

PKG-rover:

N = 24

pretest1 : -0.58

training1:0.53

training2:0.64

test1:0.22

training3:0.82

training4:0.84

test2:0.23

Standardization: ALL data +2?, then (test2-pretest)/pretest

standardized test2: 0.71

PKG-sitter:

N = 10

pretest1 : -0.24

training1:0.37

training2:0.58

test1:0.20

training3:0.75

training4:0.72

test2:0.41

standardized test2: 0.48

WTB:

N = 13

pretest1 : -0.46

training1:0.70

training2:0.73

test1:-0.01

training3:0.76

training4:0.81

test2:0.16

standardized test2: 0.57

## update on self learning&longterm memory

on Monday, April 3rd, 2017 1:44

longterm test:

1 from sitter,  8 from wtb, 3 from rover (total N = 12)

mean(test): 0.248          SD(test): 0.7

Longterm test Control

1 from sitter, 2 from rover (N=3)

mean(test):-0.386           SD(test):0.79

Two Sample:

Based on 50%(20%) of statistical power, the minimum sample size is 7 (17)for both group.

One Sample (assume control group has the average of PI is 0):

Based on 50% (20%) of statistical power, the minimum sample size is 22 (49)for both group.

https://www.dssresearch.com/KnowledgeCenter/toolkitcalculators/samplesizecalculators.aspx

Self learning test:

sitter N=5

wtb N= 4

## update on self learning and longterm memory

on Monday, March 27th, 2017 2:07

5 measurements on self learning from rover:

6 measurements on self learning form sitter:

10 measurements on self learning from wtb:

4 measrements on long term test from rover:

(right punishment)

3 measrements on long term test from sitter (fly stops a lot during test, this result may not be accurate):

(13:left punishment, 19: right punishment)

7 measrements on long term test from wtb

(left punishment)

## PKG and WTB self learning test and long term memory test

on Monday, March 20th, 2017 12:11

PKG rover self learning N=5

rover test on next day N=2

WTB self learning N=7

WTB test on next day N=4

2 rover, 4 wtb, 1 sitter test result after 24 hours

## self learning from WTB

on Friday, March 10th, 2017 2:30

By contrast of PKG rover, this result shows PI from wtb. N = 4

test1 PI= -0.05

test2 PI= -0.08

## PKG rover update

on Monday, March 6th, 2017 10:17

There is the result of 20 measurements on PKG rover.

pretest:-0.45

train1:0.56

train2:0.71

test1:0.47

train3:0.83

train4:0.87

test2:0.39

## PKG rover update

on Friday, February 24th, 2017 1:48

After adjusting the laser angle, PI got much improved. But, the test 2 phase shows a lower PI than test 1 in most of cases, the reason for that is still unclear. The following is the result of 9 measurements without drifting.

train1 PI: 0.50

train2: 0.42

test1: 0.39

train3:0.61

train4: 0.63

test2: 0.06 ???