aPKC/FoxP pathway
on Tuesday, January 7th, 2025 1:18 | by Julia Schulz
- Summary protein-protein aPKC interactions flybase results
aPKC: atypical protein kinase C/ Serine/threonine protein kinase
- function: encodes a member of the conserved Par complex, is required for apico- basal cell polarity in the germ line as well as in epithelial and neural precursor cells, for epithelial planar cell polarity and for cell proliferation.
- expression pattern:
- indirect flight muscle ((thoracic dorso-longitudinal muscles (DLM))
- high in MNs (70% in leg muscle motor neurons)
1.1 Potential aPKC protein interaction partners in MNs
Gene name | Flybase ID | Protein | Description |
discs large 1(dlg) | FBgn0001624 | guanylate kinase | cell polarity maintenance of apicobasal polaritycellular growth control during larval developmentantagonistic to the aPKC complex in polarity regulation and synaptic development |
futsch | microtubule binding protein | formation of synaptic buttons at the neuromuscular junctions | |
par-1 | FBgn0260934 | non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase | microtubule cytoskeleton organization,axis specification and cell polarity |
stardust (sdt) | FBgn0261873 | guanylate kinase | maintenance of apico-basal cell polarity organization of zonula adherens |
still life (sif) | FBgn0085447 | guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rho family GTPases | regulation synaptic growth at NMJs |
numb | FBgn0002973 | membrane-associated inhibitor of Notch signaling | Inhibitor of notch signalingcontrols neuroblast and sense organ precursor asymmetric division |
1.2 Summary RNA-protein interactions aPKC-flybase
RNA-protein interaction | Flybase ID | source | MN expression level interaction partner/aPKC |
aPKC – kin17 | (Connell et al., 2024) | low | |
aPKC – orb | (Barr et al., 2019) | intermediate | |
aPKC – orb2 | FBgn0264307 | (Xu et al., 2014, Mastushita-Sakai et al., 2010) | high |
2. Promotor sequence analysis FoxP target genes
dFoxP
- function: transcription factor expressed in the nervous system; involved in locomotion, operant self-learning and courtship behavior
- consensus seq FoxP: AAACAaATTTC (Santos et al., 2015; JASPAR data base)
- human ortholog: Hsap\FOXP4, Hsap\FOXP1, Hsap\FOXP2, Hsap\FOXP3
- expression pattern:
- indirect flight muscle (thoracic dorso-longitudinal muscles (DLM))
- leg muscle motor neuron (high)
2.1 Potential FoxP target genes
AAACAAATTTC
insc – Inscuteable (insc)
- function: encodes an adaptor protein required for asymmetric cell division; interacts with the microtubule binding protein encoded by mud and the adaptor encoded by pins; also binds to the apical complex proteins encoded by baz, par-6 and aPKC and may recruit microtubule binding proteins to the apical cell cortex to induce apical-basal spindle orientation
- human ortholog: –
- expression in MNs: low
AAACACATTTC
CG15233
- function: uncharacterized protein; putative target of stat and escargo, two master regulators of intestinal stem cells (Khanbabaei et al., 2023)
- human ortholog: –
- expression pattern:
- indirect flight muscle
- low in MNs (leg muscle motor neuron)
bowl
- function: putative transcription factor; leg joint formation, acting downstream of notch to pattern the leg tarsal segments;
- acts downstream of drm and lin during foregut and hindgut patterning and morphogenesis; involved in cell rearrangement during elongation of the embryonic hindgut; regulates expression of hindgut patterning genes to establish the small intestine region of the embryonic hindgut
- human orthologs: Hsap\EGR2, Hsap\KLF11, Hsap\EGR4, Hsap\ZBTB4, Hsap\KLF15, Hsap\EGR1, Hsap\OSR2, Hsap\OSR1, Hsap\ZBTB38, Hsap\ZBTB2, Hsap\EGR3, Hsap\SP2, EGR: early growth response genes, supress exessive immune responses dysfunctions associated with inflammatory autoimmunse diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS), type 1 diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease (Powrie and Coffman 1993; Liblau, Singer et al. 1995, Morita et al., 2016)
- expression pattern:
- indirect flight muscle
- low in MNs (leg muscle motor neuron)
AAACATATTTC
CG4477
- function: peptidase S1 domain-containing protein; Serine-type endopeptidase activity, involved in wing disc dorsal/ventral pattern formation; proteolysis,
- human ortholog: responsible for vital processes in man such as digestion, blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, development, fertilization, apoptosis and immunity
- expression pattern:
- low in MNs (leg muscle motor neuron)
- moderate expression in muscle cells (indirect flight muscle )
CG30354- UQCR-11L
- function: cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 6; component of the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase complex (complex III or cytochrome b-c1 complex) which is part of the mitochondrial respiratory chain; formation of the complex between cytochromes c and c1. UQCRH/QCR6 family. [a.k.a. FBgn0050354, UQCR-11L-PB, UQCR-11L-PA, CG30354],
- human ortholog: Hsap\UQCRH (Ubiquinol-Cytochrome C Reductase Hinge) protein
- expression pattern:
- indirect flight muscle
- low in MNs (leg muscle motor neuron)
AAACAGATTTC
CG10864
- function: potassium ion leak channel activity; potassium channel activity; involved in potassium ion transmembrane transport; stabilization of membrane potential; two pore domain potassium channel (TC 1.A.1.8) family
- human orthologs: Hsap\KCNK4, Hsap\KCNK18, Hsap\KCNK5, Hsap\KCNK7, Hsap\KCNK2, Hsap\KCNK10, Hsap\KCNK12, Hsap\KCNK16, Hsap\KCNK17, Hsap\KCNK6, Hsap\KCNK1
- expression pattern:
- indirect flight muscle
- low in MNs (leg muscle motor neuron)
AAACAATTTC
Lhr – Lethal hybrid rescue (Lhr)
- function: encodes a protein required to repress transposable element and satellite DNA expression. It also has a gain-of-function phenotype of causing lethality in F1 male hybrids between D. melanogaster and D. simulans
- human orthologs: –
- expression pattern:
- indirect flight muscle
- low in MNs (leg muscle motor neuron)
Category: Foxp, operant self-learning, PKC | No Comments
Strange results after pooling data
on Thursday, December 19th, 2024 3:55 | by Björn Brembs
Because the effect of yaw torque training on optomotor responses (OMRs) is still very small for now (we work on improving that), I pooled the two groups in which aPKC was knocked out in either motor neuron (MN) b1 or MN b3, as both these two groups and their WTB x aPKC/Cas9 controls seem to learn just fine (torque preference text after 8 minutes of training):
Obviously, we still need to check the Gal4 driver lines are really targeting the right neurons, but assuming they are ok, it seems like neither an aPKC knock-out in b1 alone nor in b3 alone is sufficient to affect operant self-learning. Maybe this is due to b1 and b3 acting as an agonist/antagonist pair and if one of them fails to show plasticity, the other is sufficient on its own? Another explanation could be that the torque preference depicted above is mediated by other neurons than b1 or b3 and that the OMR modulation is gone in these flies. Because the OMR effect is so small, I pooled the two groups, threw out all flies that didn’t have at least an acceptable OMR and halfway accurate OMR parameter estimation and plotted the OMR traces of the remaining 35 flies after training:
So despite these flies learning well, the OMR does not seem modulated as one can see in WT flies. However, there my be a slight effect for the fly punished on right turning torque, perhaps? However, this group also has much larger errors, which I would need to check the reason for. The quantification of the OM symmetry does not show any hint of an effect, though:
Below the total evaluation before and after training. What is weird is that despite there being no effect after training, the correlation between torque preference and OMR asymmetry seems to be there – or is it just the three outliers?
Either way, when I pooled the control flies from this experiment with the same genotype from the last experiment to get to 42 flies, only the group that was punished on left-turning torque showed the modulation:
Accordingly, the quantification shows no difference ion the control group either:
And no significant correlation between the indices either:
All in all rather puzzling results that reinforce my view that the OMR effect is much too small to practically work with. That means one of the next goals must be to get this effect size increased by, perhaps, decreasing the strength of the optomotor stimulus?
Category: operant self-learning, Optomotor response, PKC | No Comments
Final aPKC KO in b1/b3 motor neurons results – for now!
on Monday, December 2nd, 2024 2:57 | by Björn Brembs
As it seems the flies without aPKC in b1 or in b3 steering motor neurons seem to learn fine, I’ve decided to leave this dataset where it is:
But I will try and analyze their optomotor response in more detail, maybe these flies can dissociate between the spontaneous preference and the OMR plasticity?
Category: operant self-learning | No Comments
Self-learning, 8 minutes training, elav-Gal4>UAS-for-RNAi
on Monday, November 25th, 2024 11:47 | by Radostina Lyutova
It seems that panneuronal downregulation of the expression of the foraging gene impairs yow torque learning when flies were trained for 8 minutes.
Category: Operant learning, operant self-learning, PKG, Rover/Sitter | No Comments
b1/b3 aPKC KO flies still learning, OMR unaffected
on Friday, November 22nd, 2024 3:47 | by Björn Brembs
Now with over 20 flies in each group, it becomes more and more apparent that both the flies without aPKC in either b1 or b3 steering motor neurons still learn just fine:
As with the aPKC knock-out in FoxP neurons, also here, the optomotor response seems normal as well:
Interesting is the scatter in the slope parameter for the control flies:
Category: operant self-learning, Optomotor response, PKC | No Comments
Getting there: knocking out aPKC in b1 or b3
on Friday, November 15th, 2024 4:02 | by Björn Brembs
Slowly getting the sample size going. As of now, it seems aPKC is either not needed in steering motor neurons b1 and b3, or that knocking aPKC out in only one of them is not sufficient to have an effect on operant self-learning. Shown is the first 2min test period after 8min of training, all three groups seem to show learning, at least at this stage:
Category: operant self-learning, PKC | No Comments
Early days: testing individual steering motor neurons in self-learning
on Monday, October 28th, 2024 11:39 | by Björn Brembs
Now that we have established that the plasticity underlying self-learning is located somewhere in the steering motor neurons of the ventral nerve cord, the next question is: which of the neurons are involved. To this end I have now started to knock-out aPKC in either B1 neurons or in B3 neurons. The muscles innervated by these motor neurons are an agonist/antagonist pair and serve to advance/delay the turning point of the wing, leading to a larger or smaller, respectively, wing stroke amplitude. Asymmetry in the activity of these neurons leads to yaw torque – which is the behavior we condition. In the first two weeks, I noticed that all three groups (B1- knock-out, B3 knock-out and genetic controls) seem to fly reasonably well. So far, it doesn’t seem like there are any striking differences between the lines, but it is still early days and about three times more animals are needed before one can draw any firm conclusions:
Category: operant self-learning, PKC_localisation | No Comments
Small but important differences
on Monday, July 22nd, 2024 8:52 | by Björn Brembs
Slowly the data are filling up and we start to see some differences emerge between the controls and the aPKC knock-outs:
We still need to get to about N=40, so there is still some way to go.
Category: operant self-learning, PKC | No Comments
Quality control reduced number of animals
on Monday, July 15th, 2024 8:34 | by Björn Brembs
Going over the optomotor responses with a fine comb revealed a bunch of flies where the algorithm wasn’t able to provide a proper fit for the OMR asymptote. Therefore, I will need more time to finish the data set. Here the current torque-learning PIs:
Clearly, the genetic controls learn while the flies with knocked-out aPKC in FoxP neurons fail to show a significant learning score. However, the OMR asymmetry effect in the genetic controls appears weaker than the one we discovered in WTB flies, as can be seen in the OMR traces after the self-learning:
Then again, at the .05 level, the asymmetry index is significant. Not the alpha level we commonly use, but also a lower N than we strive for (above is before training, below is after):
The transgenic experimental flies, in contrast, don’t seem to show much of an effect at all:
Category: Foxp, operant self-learning, PKC | No Comments
Almost there
on Monday, July 8th, 2024 8:33 | by Björn Brembs
Not many fliers left now. Will start evaluating optomotor asymmetry now.
Category: operant self-learning, Optomotor response, PKC | No Comments