Updates on Optomotorics and DTS evaluation

on Monday, December 16th, 2019 1:57 | by

DTS: The graph below is an example image of how color according to category looks like. The output now adds a unique color for each category. The one below has three different colors as the pretest phase does not use any pattern and is therefor read as its own category.

Optomotorics: The software worked as it should although it had a couple of issues. Wrong information in xml sheet was one of them: this is now fixed so that it enters duration as seconds and the correct terms for a_pos and j_pos are used

The other issue was that at the end of the experiment about 40-50 data points were missing/removed. My speculation was that this either had to do with data being removed at the end of the experiment or that it ended prematurely. Turns out that the later was the cause.

As simple as it might seem, there was a lot of investigation to find this bug. To fix this I simply had to replace
if curr_count >= self.test_time() - 100:
with
if curr_count >= self.test_time() - 30:

Recent data Wtb vs FoxP

on Monday, December 9th, 2019 12:50 | by

Recent Wtb data with old FoxP

Pretest Wtb, Cs and FoxP

on Monday, December 2nd, 2019 1:59 | by

Pretest of standart yaw torque learning experiments. No learning behaviour yet, troubleshooting ongoing. ContonS fly’s seems to perform better. (Same Wtb, FoxP and Cs data for each graph)

Wtb vs FoxP
Cs vs FoxP
Cs vs Wtb

Inverted data Wtb vs FoxP

on Monday, November 25th, 2019 2:01 | by

Testing the code for the shiming divice data

on Monday, November 25th, 2019 1:58 | by

Changing the contingency for the data.

Pretest with Wtb fly’s

on Monday, November 11th, 2019 1:31 | by

Pretest with Wtb fly’s to evaluate if the setup is working correctly.

N=16, negative score: 9, positive score 5, indifferent 2.

Learning deficit due to old age?

Scores shuld be inverted. 3 example PIs

No learning
Learning

Indifferent

General test of the produced data with the evaluation code.

on Monday, November 11th, 2019 12:47 | by

Test files for 10 sec, with fixed value (1, -1) and swiching the contingency (left punished, right punished). Evaluation file makes no sens.

Flight simulator pre-test

on Monday, September 16th, 2019 1:26 | by

Test cross

on Monday, September 16th, 2019 1:13 | by

StingerGFP X P(n-syb-Gal4)

Results of T-maze experiments (yellow light)

on Monday, August 19th, 2019 1:43 | by


T- maze experiments were done with Norpa/Crimson x Gr28bd/TrpA1 lines without ATR (n=28) and with ATR (n=28). We have done all experiments which belong to Norpa/Crimson x Gr28bd/TrpA1lines. End of all experiments with them; the ATR ones seem like tend to escape from the yellow light as shown at the graph. NO ATR ones seem like moving more randomly.
On the other hand 5 different groups (THD’-GAL4xNorpA/Crimson with and without ATR, THD1-GAL4xNorpA/Crimson with and without ATR and W[1118]x NorpA/Crimson). Group1 (n=10) Group2(n=11) Group3(n=9) Group4 (n=10) Group5(n=9). Still, we don’t know that the which lines belong to which groups. The graph shows the PI numbers according to the T-maze experiments that we have done.