This picture shows all of the positive clones in the ELISA from the 1st screen

While this picture shows just the clones that have a high response for the peptide the mice where injected with, a low response for any other random peptide, and furthermore a low response for BSA

I add another animal to the count (so now n=5) and the standard deviation increased. Since I used a very young fly it could be that the cell number is age dependent. But since it can be also individual differences, after San Diego I will make an age related analysis

Here´s  a picture of a WTB fly and a foxP-KO-homozigous. I dissected all together and I did not know which one was which. But I manage to recognize them, which means that they are well recognizable. Just to be sure i will do that another time. (Also in order to have better dissections).

The distance between the two “hemispheres” in the WTB has an average of 5,4 um (n=3)

The distance between the two “hemispheres” in the KO has an average of  32,2 um (n=2)

The length of the protocerebral bridge in the WTB has an average of 95,7 um (n=3)

The the protocerebral bridge in the KO has an average of  140,3 um (n=2)

The more brains I see, the more I am convinced that the problem is not about my dissection

this result is still to be verified by deleting the red fluorescent eyes to the flies

Counting of FoxP-isoB-Gal4 positive cells in adult and larvae brains (no VNC). Five brains counted for each age

Me and Anders spent some time at the imaris trying to get confidence with the software. We managed to do volume rendering and we counted the FoxP-isoB positive cells

the count resulted really similar to the one I´ve done by eyes:

The first 3 images show the protocerebral bridge in FoxP mutated flies. In the second line the first picture shows the protocerebral bridge in a FoxP isoB-Gal4 fly. The last image is taken and modifies from the Virtual Fly Brain