on Monday, April 15th, 2019 2:41 | by Miroslav Stojic
Final Stats (flew more than 8min/out of):
– Wild type: 14/17 (82%)
– ElavGal4 x UAS-Ryr 28919: 3/13 (23%)
– ElavGal4 x UAS-Ryr 65885: 13/100 (13%)
ElavGal4 x UASRyR 65885
on Monday, April 8th, 2019 1:14 | by Miroslav Stojic
Last week (1.-7.Apr 2019) we noted how many flies want to fly more than 8 min and here is the result (only the ones we noted):
– Wild type: 8/9 (88%)
– ElavGal4 x UAS-Ryr 28919: 3/12 (25%)
– ElavGal4 x UAS-Ryr 65885: 6/35 (17%)
Trace (Downsampled 5) Graphs of Recordings
ElavGal4 x UAS-Ryr 28919:
ElavGal4 x UAS-Ryr 65885:
on Monday, April 1st, 2019 2:54 | by Miroslav Stojic
Elav-Gal4 x UAS-SERCA 44581 flies => Lethal before adulthood! (in all 5 vials so far)
on Tuesday, May 15th, 2018 12:26 | by Christian Rohrsen
and at 40x
In this link we have a video of a 3D stainning pattern zoomed_CC
on Monday, January 29th, 2018 12:40 | by Christian Rohrsen
what do you think is the best quality control for accepting a trace for the analysis or not. I was thinking the 3D mapping gives a good hint but without quantification.
on Monday, March 14th, 2016 1:48 | by Christian Rohrsen
This is now the results from trying to predict the fly behavior doing ensembles of two predictions for the next 200 data points at two different points of the traces.
From what we see here, there is no “flattening” in the prediction of the fly when the neurons under c105 and c232 are targeted by TNT. This is done with around 14/15 flies for each group with two predictions in each ensemble of the two starting points. That makes a total of 15flies x 3 groups x 2 starting points for prediction x 2 predictions per ensemble = 180 prediction traces. Now I´m trying to calculate it by making correlations of bins in the prediction-observed for the same fly
on Monday, December 14th, 2015 2:42 | by Pablo Martinez
Males WTB x C105;;C232 (control)
Males UAS-TNT-E x C105;;C232
Males UAS-TNT-E x WTB (control)
on Monday, December 7th, 2015 2:56 | by Pablo Martinez
The time between samples was different depending on the background programs running on the background:
More differences in time within samples when more programs are running at the same time as strokelitude (3nd 1/3 of the plot), when just the display of the camera is running( 1st 1/3 of the plot), and everything shut down(2nd 1/3 of the plot).
The differences among sampling intervals was bigger but with an adjustment of the data, Christian Rohrsen managed to changed. The time between two samples could arise until 1.7 seconds and with the correlation, the time is not bigger than 0.05 seconds.
The strains of flies used fore the experiments are:
UAS-TNT-E, that express the tetanus toxin in the neural cells, using GAL4 system. Being Used as a control.
c105;;c232, that contains a promotor region to express the toxin. Being used as a control.
And the cross between both to have the expression of the tetanus toxin.
Some data from the control flies (UAS-TNT-E):
And some data of the spikes:
on Monday, November 23rd, 2015 2:59 | by Pablo Martinez
With the corresponding trace exerpt with the spikes of the figure above (1)
and two more from other flies:
on Monday, November 16th, 2015 2:52 | by Pablo Martinez